no idea sorry but thanks for all your work, I 'm not much of a reader but have followed your work on and off for years ...appreciate having people still dedicated to uncovering and telling the truth.
It could be that it was sent only to the paid subscribers. Since it included only the video, which is not available for free subscribers, there was nothing to preview for free subscribers so Substack didn't send them an email. Or perhaps it sent but they were unable to open the video post..
I got this message and it seemed no different from usual in how it appeared on my email. I look forward to your articles and try to share with friends and family as what you say is not usually available elsewhere. Thanks for your dedication to exposing the truth.
The bastards are going after Substack by the looks of it - too many inconvenient truths. Not saying the problem you describe is linked but it's probably worth being aware of
It is getting harder and harder to access information going against the official narrative. Endless verification that you are human.... The other day I received a mail that I cancelled my Boycat app subscription, I never did that. Grayzone and Mintpress get their payments blocked.... The rulers in the west are desparate the control the narrative
Perhaps the pricing monkeys at Amazon (you know, the ones who jack-up prices to jerk you around) have gained a foothold at Substack. Nothing is honest any more. It's bullshit, corruption, and manipulation... It's everywhere!
I don't subscribe to the substack. I follow it with RSS on Inoreader. The post did indeed appear there but I cannot watch the video. It says it's a "Paid episode: The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Craig’s Substack"
n this article, I will present evidence suggesting that Substack is not just noticeably censored from the outside, but also possibly engaging in censorship on the inside.
I will use data from prominent counter-mainstream-narrative authors who are heavily censored on other platforms and who are experiencing concerning signs of censorship on Substack.
It’s important to note that, despite their ongoing censorship on other platforms, these writers do not necessarily believe that Substack is censoring them. Nevertheless, they are experiencing remarkably similar trends that I would argue point to something more than can be explained by their individual experiences.
These trends include:
Precipitous decline in paid subscribers
Total subscribers hovering around a set point
Dramatic declines in page views, impressions, conversions to subscribes
"I was first alerted to this trend by Sasha Latypova, with whom I co-published the Covid Dossier – a heavily censored report on the global military/intelligence coordination of the Covid operation.
(Sasha noticed the following about her subscriptions: The number of paid subscribers peaked on the date of the release of the Dossier and has been declining precipitously ever since. This is not likely to be due to lack of interest in Sasha’s Substack material, as the overall number of subscribers has been increasing steadily:"
I received a notification for this posting but not for the video. I do not know why that should be.
Echoing Raoul above, you may want to consider adopting the practice of Simplicius The Thinker whereby he makes most of his posts free but several times a month will restrict full access to certain articles, usually the longer ones, to his paid subscribers. I suppose it is a matter of finding a balance, the sweet spot, between wider readership and income.
I got the email and saw the post on twitter about it. I'm a subscriber to this substack and also a follower of Craig on twitter. It is the only way to be sure...
It might be, because when we open your posts, we get so far and then, told if we want to read the remainder of the post, we have to subscribe.
no idea sorry but thanks for all your work, I 'm not much of a reader but have followed your work on and off for years ...appreciate having people still dedicated to uncovering and telling the truth.
No idea what's going on. Nevertheless, great article on Venezeula.
It could be that it was sent only to the paid subscribers. Since it included only the video, which is not available for free subscribers, there was nothing to preview for free subscribers so Substack didn't send them an email. Or perhaps it sent but they were unable to open the video post..
I got this message and it seemed no different from usual in how it appeared on my email. I look forward to your articles and try to share with friends and family as what you say is not usually available elsewhere. Thanks for your dedication to exposing the truth.
The bastards are going after Substack by the looks of it - too many inconvenient truths. Not saying the problem you describe is linked but it's probably worth being aware of
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2026/feb/07/revealed-how-substack-makes-money-from-hosting-nazi-newsletters
Didn’t get it but seen it on your timeline. Thanks
Substack had a security leakage the other day.
Not sure if it is related, some tech wiz may have an answer on that
https://substack.com/@moebiusinfinity/note/c-211423553?r=201kyx&utm_source=notes-share-action&utm_medium=web
It is getting harder and harder to access information going against the official narrative. Endless verification that you are human.... The other day I received a mail that I cancelled my Boycat app subscription, I never did that. Grayzone and Mintpress get their payments blocked.... The rulers in the west are desparate the control the narrative
Perhaps the pricing monkeys at Amazon (you know, the ones who jack-up prices to jerk you around) have gained a foothold at Substack. Nothing is honest any more. It's bullshit, corruption, and manipulation... It's everywhere!
I don't subscribe to the substack. I follow it with RSS on Inoreader. The post did indeed appear there but I cannot watch the video. It says it's a "Paid episode: The full episode is only available to paid subscribers of Craig’s Substack"
I recieved the email. I appreciate your work and PayPal £3 a month. Keep it up!
There are many allegations from substack authors that substack is shadowbanning posts.
Is Substack a Censored Platform?
Here’s some evidence that suggests it is.
https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/is-substack-a-censored-platform
n this article, I will present evidence suggesting that Substack is not just noticeably censored from the outside, but also possibly engaging in censorship on the inside.
I will use data from prominent counter-mainstream-narrative authors who are heavily censored on other platforms and who are experiencing concerning signs of censorship on Substack.
What is happening to these writers on Substack?
https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/is-substack-a-censored-platform
It’s important to note that, despite their ongoing censorship on other platforms, these writers do not necessarily believe that Substack is censoring them. Nevertheless, they are experiencing remarkably similar trends that I would argue point to something more than can be explained by their individual experiences.
These trends include:
Precipitous decline in paid subscribers
Total subscribers hovering around a set point
Dramatic declines in page views, impressions, conversions to subscribes
Demotion of sensitive content
Precipitous decline in paid subscribers 2024/2025
"I was first alerted to this trend by Sasha Latypova, with whom I co-published the Covid Dossier – a heavily censored report on the global military/intelligence coordination of the Covid operation.
(Sasha noticed the following about her subscriptions: The number of paid subscribers peaked on the date of the release of the Dossier and has been declining precipitously ever since. This is not likely to be due to lack of interest in Sasha’s Substack material, as the overall number of subscribers has been increasing steadily:"
I received a notification for this posting but not for the video. I do not know why that should be.
Echoing Raoul above, you may want to consider adopting the practice of Simplicius The Thinker whereby he makes most of his posts free but several times a month will restrict full access to certain articles, usually the longer ones, to his paid subscribers. I suppose it is a matter of finding a balance, the sweet spot, between wider readership and income.
I got the email and saw the post on twitter about it. I'm a subscriber to this substack and also a follower of Craig on twitter. It is the only way to be sure...
Don't know. But I did catch it on YT. Also limiting your articles to paid subscribers is not the way to go imo.